A brilliant, seamless display system at any scale By blending and warping multiple projectors, CineMassive can deliver a seamless, immersive display system of any size and shape. Our blended projection solutions offer extraordinary resolutions and vivid color at massive scale. These systems are ideal for simulation, training, architecture, engineering, and other applications that require a seamless or unusually-shaped display. Our team will evaluate your use-case, environment, and business objectives to design the ideal blended projection solution for your needs. Every system is powered by the CineMassive processing and rendering platform and leverages professional-grade projectors from our industry-leading partners.

Download Video Dangdut Koplo Palapa Hot. Your system will be installed and integrated at your location by our expert team.

Ok, so you want to start projection mapping? The good news is that there are a lot of programs out there that will allow you to do so, but before you put the time in to learning any of them, take a quick peek at my thoughts below or just play around in our Tools section and see for yourself: These tools are just the start and if you learn one, then the next step is to start making content for your mappings. Lets first start by narrowing down your options based on Budget (.

Mac / Linux / PC / Code [spb_single_image image=”2105″ image_size=”full” frame=”noframe” intro_animation=”none” full_width=”no” lightbox=”yes” link_target=”_self” width=”1/1″ el_position=”first last”] While this question may seem basic to answer, your choice here could make the difference in the long run. That also being said, if you plan on outputting to more than 6 individual projectors you should consider upping your $1,000 software budget ( see Pro Systems at bottom of page). First up, Mac. Apple’s dominance of the market has been growing wildly over the past number of years, and for good reason too They use high end components when building their machines, the average mac should last you well over 3 years, but they do come at a cost, and if your a super user, you may want to upgrade every year for higher performance, thus ->PC. For Mac OSX there are a number of easy to use applications, but the drawback in learning them is hardware costs and lack of user upgradability.

Christie's edge blending and image warping solutions enable you to show multiple edge-blended images seamlessly and create warped displays, quickly and easily, on any projection surface. The camera-based software automatically aligns and blends multi-projection systems in minutes with unsurpassed accuracy. Dec 10, 2013 - 15 min - Uploaded by Ventuz TechnologyWith the release of Ventuz version 4.02 we are introducing a new and improved warping and.

And so, PC’s, without getting into the argument of Mac vs PC, I will say this, more than 2 video cards, custom media servers, lower prices, full user upgradability, tons of options, and even Hackintosh’s. That being said, I personally still use a Mac for projection mapping, but that may change soon. Next up, Linux, if you are running this type of setup, at this current point in time the only piece of projection mapping software that I am aware of is,, but that being said, LPMT is based off of tool for creative coding. Since OpenFrameworks is code based, if want to program your own software, write your own scripting, then the sky is the limit and there are more options out there than I am willing to get into. Lastly Code, is a small word for such large possibilities,,, etc. If you can program you can choose any of the above operating systems, get the performance you are looking for and even reduce costs, but the trade here is time. Most of the work is done for you with the Mac / PC applications and since content is king, if a project is just around the corner, it may be in your best interests to start creating your visual content than to start experimenting with code.

Either way the choice is yours. (Note: While there is and Android development along with and other specializes environments I am not going to focus on them in this article).

That being said, I’m only going to focus on the two primary choices in this article. Software (Mac & PC): What’s great is that a lot of the software used for creating content is cross platform, Mac & PC mainly. Popular tools of the trade include, Photoshop, Illustrator, After Effects, & Cinema 4D, while there are many more, these 4 and others like them should give you a large enough playground to create custom visuals. Additionally, while they are not in the list below check out,,,, and. As for Projection Mapping software, here are my rankings with reasons below: (Note: these are my person opinions and not those of PMC). Mac: #1: is simple and powerful, it is a stand alone Projection Mapping software that is constantly being updated based on user feedback, it also hosts a load of other features. 4videosoft Mkv Video Converter 5 0 28 Serial Rar.

And due to its focus as a stand alone mapping software it currently sits at #1 in the Mac category for performance, simplicity, and price. #2: comes in 2nd, but not far from Madmapper, just different, it is also a great piece of software and focuses on a timeline playback, meaning if you are looking to pull off a multimedia show multiple nights in a row, than Millumin might be your number #1. #3:, With more features than Madmapper & Millumin, it is first a VJ software & second a projection mapping application, it’s not that they can’t do similar things, but Resolume’s interface may take your more than a day to learn and is better suited for live visual blending and mixing in addition to projection mapping.

#4:; similar to Resolume, it is both a VJ & Projection mapping application and its abilities are split between the two, one of GrandVJ’s core functions is it’s integration with Arkaos’ MediaMaster, which is listed in our pro systems section. #5:, rated 5th but still on the list because it is actually perfect for almost anyone looking to start, why? Because it has all the features that you need and it is FREE. While the others will provide you with a demo, VPT 7 is ready to be learned. It’s GUI is not as intuitive as some of the others, but there are enough tutorials floating around to easily get you started. PC: #1:, and if it was available natively for the mac than it would be #1 there too; however, there is definitely going to be a learning curve, a few months for most new comers and while it is node based you are going to want to learn some code with it as well. While it is not as easy to master as Madmapper, VPT, or Resolume, it has quickly become the backend for most of the professional companies out there.

Get good enough with Touch Designer and you may even find a career in doing so. #2:, with Resolume’s custom DXV video codec you can get great playback performance on a Windows machine that surpasses many other applications. Its boat load of features, mapping and VJ, make it a great stand along program for just about any venue. #3:, similar to Resolume, it is both a VJ & Projection mapping application and its abilities are split between the two, one of GrandVJ’s core functions is it’s integration with Arkaos’ MediaMaster, which is listed in our pro systems section. #4:, VPT 7 is ready to be learned. It packs all the features that you need to get started and it is FREE. The GUI is not as intuitive as some others, but there are enough tutorials floating around to easily get you started.

#5: (Updated), after taking in some user feedback and experimenting with Mapio 2 Pro’s pixel mapping features, Mapio has replaced Facade Signage in the number 5 spot. It’s GUI is less confusing than that of FS and Visution continues to add more 3D functionality into it’s backend. It is available for Mac & PC, but due to it’s memory usage and cpu load on the mac end it did not make the cut. Pro Systems: I can’t rate the pro systems in a specific order because I haven’t used all of them, hopefully that will change some day, but for now I will say they pack enough power and technical support to pull off the biggest events to date. There are many companies out there and we are constantly updating our tools section, so click to stay updated.

Can we say Super Bowl XLIX w/ Katy Perry – Or good enough for Celine Dion maybe good enough for – 87th Academy Awards with Hippotizer – Media Server, which is also the powerhouse behind one of the largest projection mapping competitions in the world:, servers and software. Additionally, and servers that run stadiums.

Originally known for their lighting consoles also offers advanced projection mapping and autoblending with their software and media servers. Lastly I just wanted to add that Front pictures figured out a way to hook up 64 projectors to a single media server using touch designer.

I hope you found this article helpful in making your decision, as the software changes, so will this list, keep checking out our to stay up to date on the latest. Massimiliano, I did not forget Mapio 2 Pro, it just didn’t make the cut due to UI design and performance. As you can see from the attached images, this was with both programs playing the exact same video with full screen output and only one slice. Once you start adding more slices into the mix this load and memory usage becomes greater, Resolume and GrandVJ have a similar load to Mapio, but they also have a complete VJ backend and have been optimized for multiple clip playback. On the PC side, I’d put Mapio 2 Pro on the List if VPT wasn’t free. Facade Signage only came in #5 because it had some more unique projection mapping features than Mapio for windows.

Mapio has Pixel mapping which is an awesome feature, but is more of a DMX & lighting aspect than a projection mapping one. Mapio2Pro: 81.4% CPU Load & 331.9MB of memory vs Mad mapper: 61.9% CPU load & 119.7MB of memory Madmapper is using more than half the memory than Mapio and has a lower CPU load.

I hope that answers your question. I.a., I did not forget Mapio 2 Pro, it just didn’t make the cut due to UI design and performance. As you can see from the attached images, this was with both programs playing the exact same video with full screen output and only one slice. Look in the comments someone else asked a similar question and I gave them a slightly longer answer. Mapio2Pro: 81.4% CPU Load & 331.9MB of memory vs Mad mapper: 61.9% CPU load & 119.7MB of memory Madmapper is using more than half the memory than Mapio and has a lower CPU load. I hope that answers your question.

On PC, there are professional system that you didn’t mention: Dataton Watchout and Modulo Pi. Dataton is a modular system allowing to map on large areas with a virtually unlimited number of video projectors, each with its own resolution and edge blending settings. It offers a powerful deformation grid, a user-intuitive multi-layer programming system, MIDI sync and triggering, 3D deformations and animated properties for every object (video or image), it supports alpha Modulo Pi is quite similar, but it’s more cuelist-oriented (while Watchout is more based on timelines) and it goes further in term of deformations since it has a complete multi-zone deformation system with curve interpolation and many communication protocols to interact with MIDI, DMX or even graphic switchers like the Barco Encore •. You are correct Ludovic, but as the article states the focus of this was on the sub-$1,000 software. All of those + the costs for their hardware integration is above what most beginners are looking for. Not to mention there are so many “professional” options out there with very proprietary workflows, that it would take a dedicated article on each of them to cover the pro’s and con’s.

We have a number of D3, Avolite, and Green Hippo fans that also swear by their own setup and workflows. As I like to think about it, depending on what the rental company has, that’s what most of us use. I am hoping to use projection mapping for the first time in the huge theatre at our school with Korean/Western students aged 13-18. I want to give them a taster and then let them fly with the technology when they have made both stand alone photoshopped (static) scenery, devised black and white/sepia silent movies and animated coloured effects on to number of different sized flown in flat projection screens for our production of ‘Singin’ in the Rain’. I have been told by friends that I will need to purchase software to work with our Qlab cueing program in the theatre as well as a number of projectors. Would you recommend a coupling of two programs such as madmapper and Qlab to do this or would this be overboard?

Our surfaces are only flat flown in cloths and screens (obviously of different dimensions and at different locations flying over the stage) as I am trying to keep it simple! But if the students and staff get on with the technology would be better invest- for future productions? Is there anyone on the circuit that can offer me and my assistant any training in the next month?